How a workflow becomes software here: mapped, built in slices, verified with numbers, and handed over with material another team can actually use.
The CV spans architecture, implementation, performance, DevOps, automation, and user-facing systems. The method keeps those responsibilities connected instead of handing them across a wall.
Before architecture, the workflow. What enters the system, who touches it, where it stalls, and what evidence proves it worked. Constraints become requirements.
Discovery slice → build slices → verification → handoff. Priced per slice, with a definition of done agreed before the first commit.
Budgets for load time, bundle size, and cost-per-request are decided at the start, not negotiated after launch.
Screenshots, metrics, repos, and live URLs. If it cannot be shown, it does not go in the case study.
Models get clear scopes, structured outputs, citations, and escalation paths. Confidence is designed, not assumed.
Fewer features, properly finished: accessible, tested, documented, and fast under real content volume.
Dashboards are built for the person doing the job at 4pm with thirty tabs open, not for the demo room.
A system nobody else can maintain is unfinished, no matter how well it performs this quarter.
References available on request, including contacts at the companies behind the work below.
“He took over a build that had stalled for two quarters, shipped the missing 30% in six weeks, and left documentation the internal team still uses a year later.”
“The tender analysis went from three days of reading to an afternoon of deciding. The eligibility scoring alone paid for the project.”
“Rare to find someone who argues about query plans in the morning and about button hierarchy in the afternoon — and is right about both.”
Most engagement friction comes from unstated assumptions. These are stated.
Written async by default, one live call per week, demos every Friday.
Your repo, your infrastructure, your accounts. No hostage situations.
Typed end to end, tested at the seams, reviewed before merge, documented on exit.
Scope changes get a written delta with effort and impact — never a surprise invoice.
Assisted, reviewed, and accountable. Generated code is read before it ships.
CET business hours with overlap into UK mornings and Swedish afternoons.
Something not covered? Send it over — a direct answer costs nothing and saves a call.
Ask a questionWith a paid or scoped discovery: the workflow, the constraints, the expected business outcome. You get a practical engineering path and a fixed first slice, not a vague estimate.
Yes — often as the senior builder inside a smaller team, or as the person who rescues a stalled build and hands it back documented. Remote, overlapping CET hours, comfortable with UK and Swedish schedules.
Most AI SaaS slices land between €6k and €25k depending on integration depth, document volume, and compliance needs. I quote per slice with a clear definition of done.
Frequently. The first week is a code health pass: architecture map, risk log, performance baseline, and a prioritised list of what to fix, what to keep, and what to rewrite.
Runbooks, observability, and a recorded walkthrough. Optional retainer for iteration, but dependency on me is treated as a failure mode.
Send the desired outcome, the users, the current bottleneck, the stack, and the timeline. You'll get a practical senior engineering path for the build — not a brochure.